On an unrelated errand we were looking up how much the US spends on its defense. We made the terrible mistake of just Googling it. But hey, that mistake turned into an insight we can share!
Turns out a lot of different people have very different ideas of how much the US spends on its defense as a percent of the Federal Budget. So let’s play a game.
Before we start: Guess your own number. Just for fun. Don’t need to share it with anyone, no “I told you so’s,” no points won or lost.
Here’s a picture of a fighter jet to give you time to think before seeing the numbers.
Now that you’re done, let’s look at what different reputable and not-so-reputable sources say. (Click images for links.)
$1.3T out of a $3.8T budget
(This one has been popular on social media.)
Later they say 21.7% of the whole but say this is “misleading”
They peg it at 15.7% (3.3% of a GDP of just over $18T and a budget of $3.8T) – and that’s actually projected to decrease as a percentage of GDP and budget over the next 10 years (based on 2015 policy). It’s down about 1/3 since 1990. See page 81 of the report.
I’m not going to tell you who’s “right” and who’s “wrong” because it all depends on how you count it. Do you or do you not include:
Even including all of that we have no idea how one gets to 48%+ of total federal budget, but we decied not to dig into the math.
Point is you can chop this up a lot of ways, and so somewhat reputable folks can come up with different numbers, and not be “wrong” based on whatever assumptions they have. The CBO may not even have it “right” based on what you want to put into the bucket.
The 57% number got very popular in 2015 sliding around the Internet. Turns out it’s an image of only discretionary funding (rather than mandatory), and discretionary is not the whole picture: discretionary + mandatory is the full budget. Politifact breaks it down (and even the 57% of discretionary is apparently wrong). They fall in on 16%.
Either through simple laziness and carelessness, or confirmation bias, or pushing an agenda, some folks spread around the 57% number–and other people, for the same reasons, believed it.
This all goes to show: it’s easy to get duped when you’re excited about getting mad about a fact.
Ukrainian victories on the ground have been swift, dramatic, and devastating. And each win seems…
The Russians just got whipped. What the heck happened?
Mark Schauss is the host of Russian Rulers History and Battle Ground History. Known for…
https://play.acast.com/s/d1a6ddca-f102-4b5c-8d87-630132fe5aaa/62f43f685dc1ea00136539f2 Hot Updates Severodonetsk fell slowly as expected, but then Lysychansk fell quickly because Russian…
https://embed.acast.com/d1a6ddca-f102-4b5c-8d87-630132fe5aaa/62d0a6529385dd0012e405d1 Lots of ways we can split this. Much has been discussed about decoupling of…
"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times, it was the…
View Comments
Social Security is 100% self funded (FICA revenue, interest income, and general fund repayment of borrowed funds) and Medicare is mostly self funded. The post office is 100% self funded. The Unified budget that PEW and others use is an apples and oranges scam to equate self funded spending and unfunded spending. Congress passed the 1990 Budget Enforcement Act to stop the false spending reporting.
It's flat out dishonest for PEW and others to equate Social Security's or the Post Office's self-funded spending to the other departments' spending from income taxes and debt. The other problem with defining "Defense Spending" as a percentage of federal spending is there is military or "defense" spending in almost every department. For example 2/3rds to 60% of department of energy spending in spent maintaining our nuclear warhead arsenal, state dept. spending on weapons, Homeland Security, VA benifits, ect...
An accurate pie chart of federal income tax and debt spending would require a line by line spending report of each department. The charts you claim are more accurate are a farce. The federal budget published by the federal government has each department's line by line spending and revenues but that would require actual effort and intelligence instead of letting the PEW institute pass propaganda.
peaceful piano music
Healing
piano
relaxing music sleep