Happy Independence Day. Let’s talk history, shall we?

A reader and good friend reminded me recently that I wrote my thesis on the idea of Power Transitions in geopolitics. If you are a super-nerd of geopolitics or international relations it is just the thing for you right after you finish the latest Harry Potter spin-off. Otherwise, here’s the short version:

1) Nations, especially Great Powers that are close to each other, go through power transitions, in which one country’s power surpasses another.

2) This tends to lead to war when the countries are both close in power, because it’s not clear who is “boss,” essentially.

3) By contrast, when one country has a preponderance of power, they are a hegemon and peace is more likely–see Pax Romana, Pax Brittanica, Pax Americana.

4) It’s hard to predict who wins these wars–the rising power or the declining power.

5) My thesis expands on this and has a nifty large-N study that shows a pretty awesome graph confirming that this theory works really well.

They reminded me of it because he believes it’s precisely what we’re seeing in the United States that is leading to such strife. Let’s expand on that idea.

Let’s look at the strife in the United States in the late 60’s and 70’s. What was happening? Black and female liberation movements, as well as anti-war movements, were raging, and frequently conservative forces–including the government–fought back violently. There were radical/violent Black nationalist movements, and a highly active, murdering KKK. There was bra-burning, massive student protests, and the national guard firing on them. It was an incredibly tumultuous time.

What came out of it? Civil rights, the success of the second wave of feminism, the end of the draft. The rising powers won, the declining powers were largely-speaking defeated. Nobody (essentially–noting that the US is big enough to have a few of everyone) talks anymore about black people not being able to vote or not attending the same schools as whites. Women can hold positions of leadership. Etc. There is not full equality, but there is a major step towards progressivism. Interesting, the rising power of socialism/communism in the United States was crushed and neoliberalism won instead.

We can imagine the US Civil War in a similar way. The abolitionist / anti-slavery movement had grown and taken root in the north in strength relative to the slave-holding south. When the north was able to elect an anti-slavery president, Lincoln, without any Southern electoral votes, the south finally declared outright war. The rising political force of abolitionism had enough momentum to rally the north to muster the resources necessary to defeat the south–rather than let them go. Slavery was defeated forever and blacks in America were, at least, free of bondage.

Fast forward to today: we do not have the kind of violence or extremism of the 60’s, much less the Civil War. But there is political strife at a level we have not seen since then. There is a culture war in which you are pressured to take one side or another. White nationalist groups, while not nearly as popular as in the 60’s or 70’s, have become louder than they were in the 80’s-00’s, and many of them feel they have a voice in the current administration. College students have become more militant about enforcing progressive norms, even attacking professors or forcing resignations for those who don’t toe the line. AntiFa is a thing at all and will use violence to prevent far-right speakers from having a pedestal. We’re not as fractured as we were in the 1960’s, but it’s ugly.

It is a plausible hypothesis that another power transition is occurring now. Young people tend to be more socially progressive than their older counterparts, and they are growing in number, and they are demanding substantial and rapid changes to the social order and norms around race, gender, sexuality, etc. Older Americans, especially rural whites, are pushing back, attempting to maintain the norms they had established–they are the declining power in this scenario (see: Strangers in Their Own Land).

If we are in such a transition, how will the “war” play out? The Civil War was won by violence. The Civil Rights movement was won by a peaceful movement that was attacked by the declining power. By what force will this conflict play out? Good question, but if you’re considering violence please consider how effective it has been when it has not involved mass slaughter.

Erik Fogg

Erik Fogg is co-author of ReConsider’s written work, co-host of the ReConsider podcast and author of Wedged: How you became a tool of the partisan Political Establishment and How to Start Thinking for Yourself Again. Erik has a masters degree in political science from MIT and has spent years working with various NGOs, Harvard, MIT, United Nations and various private advocacy groups organizations. He’s ghost-written published books. He’s now running a software startup. Erik grew up in a very red part of Pennsylvania and moved to a very blue part of Massachusetts. Having a foot in both worlds has enabled Erik to see how both sides of the political spectrum caricature the other and has sparked his mission to create a real dialogue that cuts through the noise. Erik podcasts from his office in suburban San Mateo, surrounded by 17th and 18th-century European art, a costume-construction toolkit and table, a VR kit, and a small bed for his Boston Terrier, Oscar.

View Comments

  • You said "It's hard to predict who wins these wars--the rising power or the declining power." Do you have data on that? Did you look at historical conflicts and classify which side was which and then looked the probability of each coming out the victor? I ask because in the examples you gave the "rising power" seems to have won both times, and that is something that I would intuitively expect to be more likely.

  • It's not the far-right / older groups that are fighting against the far-left. It's the young moderates and conservatives who have seen the violence of the far-left and it's call to violently overthrow capitalist America and replace it with communism and to get rid of rights such as free speech. The number of far-right racist types is extremely low - they are currently not a significant force in this movement. However, their numbers are increasing because of the anti-white rhetoric of the left and that's a potentially dangerous trend.

Recent Posts

Ukraine XI: Asymmetric Momentum

Ukrainian victories on the ground have been swift, dramatic, and devastating. And each win seems…

1 year ago

Ukraine X: The Absolutely Dazzling Counter-Blitzkrieg

The Russians just got whipped. What the heck happened?

1 year ago

ReConsidering Russia: The Complex History of Russia

Mark Schauss is the host of Russian Rulers History and Battle Ground History. Known for…

1 year ago

Ukraine IX: Oh HI, MARS

https://play.acast.com/s/d1a6ddca-f102-4b5c-8d87-630132fe5aaa/62f43f685dc1ea00136539f2 Hot Updates Severodonetsk fell slowly as expected, but then Lysychansk fell quickly because Russian…

1 year ago

It Was the Best of Times, It Was the Worst of Times, Part 2

https://embed.acast.com/d1a6ddca-f102-4b5c-8d87-630132fe5aaa/62d0a6529385dd0012e405d1 Lots of ways we can split this. Much has been discussed about decoupling of…

1 year ago